Right for the Right Reasons
Investigates whether a world model’s confidence tracks the reasons its predictions succeed. The draft considers predictability and surprise as signals that may reveal a mismatch.
Questions currently being developed into technical drafts. Each entry describes an investigation in progress.
Investigates whether a world model’s confidence tracks the reasons its predictions succeed. The draft considers predictability and surprise as signals that may reveal a mismatch.
Uses paired worlds to ask what a model learns from their differences. By changing one condition at a time, the work examines whether a representation captures a causal distinction.
Tests whether apparent structural understanding reflects reusable competence. The focus is on behavior under changed tasks, rather than performance on familiar examples alone.
Studies when an energy function can be separated into meaningful constraints. The question is whether that structure helps explain how a model rules out inconsistent possibilities.
Examines how far language models can track nested beliefs about other agents. The draft looks for ways to distinguish a shallow answer pattern from deeper recursive reasoning.
These are working descriptions, not published papers.